top of page

Bach's Masterclass

  • Writer: Audax Records
    Audax Records
  • Aug 28, 2022
  • 3 min read

Updated: Oct 28, 2022

Johannes Pramsohler and Philippe Grisvard place Bach's Six sonatas for violin and obligato harpsichord in a new historical context and offer an intriguing snapshot of how Bach's immediate successors were influenced by his revolutionary sonata model.

© Edouard Brane

At the beginning of this project, the idea was actually to create a kind of counterpart to our album “Bach & Entourage” in which we wanted to present sonatas for violin and obbligato harpsichord from Bach’s milieu. However, during the course of our searches in the libraries of Darmstadt, Leipzig, Brussels, Berlin, Munich, Schwerin, Dresden, Rostock, and Halle, we came across an unexpected abundance of composers who had tried their hand at this new genre: Johann Matthäus Leffloth, Johann Ernst Bach, Christoph Förster, Johann Heinrich Rolle, František Ignác Tůma, and Johann Ludwig Krebs, to name just a few. We likewise looked to see what the versions for harpsichord and violin of the trio sonatas by Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, Johann Kirnberger, and Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach offered. It became a mammoth project that gave us a fantastic overview of the genre. The normal scope of a CD was thus already exceeded. We also increasingly realized that Johann Sebastian Bach could not be excluded. However, selecting merely one sonata from the famous six seemed like a sacrilege. Inspired by C. P. E. Bach’s statement, that even a quarter of century after his father’s death, the sonatas had lost none of their modernity, we decided to break up the cycle, which was probably never conceived as such by Bach (there is no complete fair copy in Bach’s hand) and place it in a new context that on the whole ultimately contained sonatas that were composed after Bach, since in our eyes his immediate contemporaries did not provide the quality to hold their own alongside the probable inventor of this ensemble form.



Our approach was, on the one hand, to view the unknown works not as second-rate, but to accord them the same respect that one shows to those by Bach, and, on the other hand, to approach Bach’s sonatas in precisely this context with fresh curiosity – without fear and the overwhelming weight of tradition. This also involved above all a renewed consideration of the tempo indications and time signatures. We placed Bach’s twenty-five movements, and by extension all fifty-seven movements of the present program, in relation to one another in a tempo coordinate system in order to receive, by means of historical sources concerned with the issue, logical tempo relationships that sometimes led to surprising results.


Especially important to us was the work on the three sonatas by Johann Adolph Scheibe. Generally speaking, a poor, pitiable blighter – one-eyed due to an accident with a drill in his father’s workshop and today known only in his role as a critic of Bach. His actually interesting idea of introducing to Germany a culture of discussion based on the models of French and English newspapers unfortunately backfired due to his polemical, sometimes malicious and opinionated character: with his famous criticism of Bach, he thoroughly ruined his reputation even for posterity, although his compositions by all means deserve more attention. Astonishing was the extent to which the slow movements of the three sonatas resembled those by Bach in terms of structure, counterpoint, and the “singability” so praised by C. P. E. Bach, and how precisely Scheibe notated embellishments – exactly one of the points for which he so harshly took Bach to task.


The result is not to be understood as a triple CD and thus not as a never-ending perpetuum mobile of harpsichord and baroque violin, but rather as three recitals to be heard individually, each of which, in its own right, is coherent, offers variety, and presents something new.



Listen/Stream/Download/Buy the album here.

Listen/Stream/Download/Buy the album here.

334 Comments


Alexandra Smith
Alexandra Smith
19 hours ago

Vào trang qs88 link cái là thấy giao diện khá thân thiện, nhìn không bị rối mắt như mấy chỗ hay nhồi chữ. Ấn tượng đầu tiên là trang sắp xếp nội dung theo từng khối nhìn khá dễ nắm, mấy ý quan trọng được đẩy lên đầu nên lướt nhanh là hiểu họ đang nói gì, không phải mò lâu. Mình dùng điện thoại 4G bấm qua vài mục thấy load lẹ, chuyển trang mượt nên đỡ khó chịu hẳn. Nói chung mình không ngồi test game hay gì, chỉ thấy cách trình bày gọn, chữ dễ đọc, nhìn không bị rối mắt. Mấy cụm hình ảnh khối thông tin ở phần đầu trang được gom lại rõ ràng nên…

Like

dwainnervi55
2 days ago

Từ trải nghiệm cá nhân, mình thường quan tâm xem một nền tảng có duy trì được sự nhất quán khi dùng lâu hay không và https://shbetz.net/  tạo cho mình cảm giác khá dễ làm quen ở điểm đó. Có hôm mình mở xổ số rồi xem thêm thể thao điện tử, sau đó quay lại phần quen thuộc mà không mất nhiều thời gian tìm lại. Điều mình chú ý thêm là hệ thống có đội ngũ hỗ trợ hoạt động liên tục nên khá thuận tiện.

Like

Alexandra Smith
Alexandra Smith
3 days ago

Vào trang 789 club cái là thấy giao diện khá thân thiện, nhìn không bị rối mắt như mấy chỗ hay nhồi chữ. Ấn tượng đầu tiên là trang sắp xếp nội dung theo từng khối nhìn khá dễ nắm, mấy ý quan trọng được đẩy lên đầu nên lướt nhanh là hiểu họ đang nói gì, không phải mò lâu. Mình dùng điện thoại 4G bấm qua vài mục thấy load lẹ, chuyển trang mượt nên đỡ khó chịu hẳn. Nói chung mình không ngồi test game hay gì, chỉ thấy cách trình bày gọn, chữ dễ đọc, nhìn không bị rối mắt. Mấy cụm hình ảnh khối thông tin ở phần đầu trang được gom lại rõ ràng nên…

Like

dwainnervi55
3 days ago

Có một lần mình thử quan sát fb88 chỉ để xem cách nền tảng phát triển Esports. Sau khi mở các giải Valorant rồi CS2, mình nhận thấy ngoài kèo thắng thua còn có nhiều lựa chọn như kết quả từng map hay tổng mạng hạ gục. Tiếp tục chuyển sang bóng đá, cách hiển thị dữ liệu vẫn giữ được sự quen thuộc. Theo mình, đây là cách mở rộng sản phẩm nhưng vẫn đảm bảo trải nghiệm nhất quán.


Like

davidthom.a.s.282.55
5 days ago

75bd app showed up in a couple posts, so I poked around out of curiosity more than anything. First thing that hit me was how easy it is to move around—nothing’s buried, and the main menu is pretty obvious without screaming at you. I’m usually bouncing after 30 seconds on sites like this, but here I didn’t feel like I was fighting the layout. The info is broken up into neat little sections too, so you can skim and pick out what you want without scrolling through a giant text dump. It just feels calm and readable, not cramped. Even the spacing between blocks makes it easier on the eyes, and the categories seem grouped in a way that actually…

Like
bottom of page